How your grade works and what we want you to understand • MATH 2200: Calculus 1
| Component | Weight | What it is |
|---|---|---|
| Concept standards | 60% (15% each) | Four standards — LOCAL, CHANGE, ACCUMULATE, CONNECT — each reported as a level from 0 to 4 (described below). |
| Section work | 40% | Work assigned by your instructor. Further details in the syllabus and/or on this WyoCourse. |
Your overall percentage translates to a letter grade as described in the syllabus.
Each standard is a body of understanding, first assessed on its cycle's exam and reported as one level. Every problem on a standard's exam, reassessment, or later opportunity is written from this guide's description of the standard.
| Level | In plain language |
|---|---|
| 4 — Thorough | Secure understanding demonstrated flexibly, with clear connections or transfer. |
| 3 — Secure | Meets the course target: conceptually correct, appropriately justified, and successfully applied. |
| 2 — Developing | Central understanding is present, but important gaps, inconsistencies, or dependence on familiar forms remain. |
| 1 — Beginning | Some relevant knowledge or procedure is evident, but a major conceptual gap remains. |
| 0 — Insufficient Evidence | The work does not yet provide usable evidence of understanding. |
There are no points on exams. Each problem receives one mark:
The problems come in three groups, named for the level they earn:
| To earn… | You need… |
|---|---|
| Level 1 | At least one ✓ or ~ somewhere on the exam. |
| Level 2 | ✓ marks on the Foundations problems — the short computational tasks. |
| Level 3 | ✓ marks on most of the Core ideas problems — the reasoning tasks: explain, justify, judge. |
| Level 4 | Level 3, plus a ✓ on the Putting it together problem — using the ideas together in a new situation. |
Each level is earned on its own problems, and a higher level counts for every level below it. Convincing Foundations work is insurance — it holds Level 2 even if the Core problems fall short — but it is not a gate: Levels 3 and 4 are earned on the Core and Putting-it-together problems alone.
The exact counts appear in a small table on each exam's cover sheet. Each instructor grades one problem for every section, and can request a second opinion in borderline cases.
Written to the end-of-semester standard. For every standard, Levels 3 and 4 describe the understanding we want you to have by the end of the course, and assessments may use any ideas related to that standard — including topics your section may not have emphasized yet. So it is normal and expected not to be at Level 3 or 4 on a standard's first exam. Because the bar never moves, a level, once earned, is safe: your recorded level can only go up.
About the running "Total."
Your level is not final. After each exam you will have structured opportunities to raise it — a correction assignment and a reassessment — and further opportunities later in the semester. Details are posted with those assignments in the cycle's WyoCourses module.
LOCAL is about the behavior of a function near a single point — what values approach, whether the function is continuous, how fast it is changing right there, and how well a straight line can stand in for it nearby — together with a habit that runs through all of it: claiming no more than your evidence supports.
What happens near a point
The line the graph wants to be
Together — this is Level 4
CHANGE (Cycle 2), and then ACCUMULATE and CONNECT (together, Cycle 3) are assessed later in the semester. Their sections will be added to this guide as each cycle begins — the levels, marks, and grading above will not change.
If you are working with a tutor or helper: show them this page (it prints cleanly if they want a copy). The most useful help is practice explaining the current standard's ideas — for LOCAL: why a limit or slope is exact (or only suggested), what continuity does and does not guarantee, what a rate means with its units, and how far a local prediction deserves trust — in your own words, without notes, the way the exam will ask.